Henrique Moniz, Nuno Ferreira Neves, Miguel Correia, Paulo VerĂssimo
Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), Leeds, UK, October 2006.
The paper presents a comparative performance study of the two main classes of randomized binary consensus protocols: a local coin protocol, with an expected high communication complexity and cheap symmetric cryptography, and a shared coin protocol, with an expected low communication complexity and expensive asymmetric cryptography. The experimental evaluation was conducted on a LAN environment, by varying several system parameters, such as the fault types and number of processes. The analysis shows that there is a significant gap between the theoretical and the practical performance results of these protocols, and provides an important insight into what actually happens during their execution.
@InProceedings{moniz06comparison,
author = {Henrique Moniz and Nuno Ferreira Neves and Miguel Correia and Paulo Ver\'{\i}ssimo},
title = {Experimental Comparison of Local and Shared Coin Randomized Consensus Protocols},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), Leeds, UK, October 2006},
year = {2006},
month = {oct}
}
Download the pdf.